Neuropathy More Condition_symptoms

post-election Reflections



Ieri ero troppo incupita per lanciarmi in un’analisi dei risultati elettorali; Today I try, but they are only fragments. I could always change his mind, in light of what will happen in the coming days.

We start from the comparison of these with the latest European policies and Europe earlier (I know it's like comparing oranges and melons, but the formations have been modified and a shift such that only make the comparison between Europe is a mess):

NATIONAL ALLIANCE

PARTY		2008 2009 EU POL		2004 2008 if all EU
The People of Freedom ' (FI + AN 2004)	35.26 37.39
ITALY UNDER				21.00
				11.50
Vallée d'Aoste - UV	0.10			0.10
NEW PSI				2.00
DEMOCRATIC PARTY - OLIVE		26.13 33.17 31.10
SVP	0.46	0, 41		0.50
LEAGUE NORTH		10.20 8.30 5.00
DI PIETRO ITALY VALUES	8.00	4 , 37
DI PIETRO - Occhetto				2.10
AUTONOMIES LIBERTE 'democratic	0.08
UNION CENTER		6.51 5.62 5.90
UDEUR				1.30
RIF.COM. - SIN.EUROPEA - COM.ITALIANI		3.38 3.08 4.85
Refounding				6.10
ITALIAN COMMUNISTS				2.40
LEFT AND RIGHT '	3.12
GREEN				2.50
SOCIALIST PARTY		0.98
LEFT CRITICAL		0.46
FOR THE COMMON GOOD		0.33
COMMUNIST PARTY OF ALTERNATIVE		0.01 0.58
Communist Workers' Party	0.54 0.57
LIST Marco Pannella - EMMA BONINO	2.42			2.20
THE RIGHT-ALL-MPA-RETIRED. CENTER	2.22			1.10
Fiamma Tricolore		0.79 2.43 0.70
UNDER NEW - MUSSOLINI	0,47			1,20
LIBERAL DEMOCRATICI - MAIE	0,23

(so perfettamente che questo schema, così come appare, è illeggibile. Purtroppo al momento non riesco a modificarlo. Se qualcuno lo vuole in formato più... decente, non ha che scrivermi e glielo mando come word o excel, a scelta. Oppure - ma appena più chiaro - lo trovate anche qui: http://solleviamoci.wordpress.com/2009/06/09/riflessioni-elettorali/ )

Apart from the fact that voter turnout continues to decline - and an important fact - it seems appropriate to recall that in the meantime has changed the electoral law in a restrictive manner (barrier 4%) in 2004 with lower percentages were obtained seats anyway.

One thing to note is that there seems no doubt that Italians appreciate and share the project supported da entrambi gli schieramenti maggiori, quello dei due partiti (PDL-PD): infatti i risultati maggiormente positivi li hanno avuti proprio i due alleati – più o meno comodi – delle due formazioni aspiranti bipolari: IdV e Lega, con un mezzo punto percentuale in più anche per l’ UDC .

Il PDL , forse perché il cavaliere ha dovuto tirare la carretta da solo , non ha avuto quell’impennata che tanto sbandierava il suddetto – quanto al suo gradimento personale ai massimi storici mondiali per il leader di un partito, che fosse solo un suo delirio di onnipotenza? But they are always too many for my taste. But they managed to elect Mastella, although in Naples already smells of fraud ...

The League is coming, and it is not surprising, but it is a very disturbing sign: it means that the war takes root among the poor and unconvincing.

The new PSI was with the right, now I've lost sight of.

The list Di Pietro growing so much and probably also takes advantage of much discontent on the left, but has since lost the Occhetto component (I think). It is not a negative figure, there are elite people from their very valid, only if I convince their positions on justice, I can not say the same for economic policy and certain other choices (the same speech on other issues, true radicals, which support).

The PD was a decrease in negative, even if it takes after all - certainly when you consider that the PD is the result of a merger (cold?) a part of DC and the PCI / PDS / DS ... the numbers are not exactly equal.

The left does not penetrate the barrier - frankly difficult goal - but here the analysis should be a bit 'more detailed (maybe because it's what interests me most?).

Both the list that anti-SEL exceed, individually, the result set as Rainbow policies (where, albeit slightly, if it lists as a common good, and Critical Left Socialist Party had was a member of the Rainbow, the quorum was reached). But compared to the 2004 European total loss (the greens were just then) 4.5%. It is certainly a blow, but keep in mind that in 2004, with little over 2%, the Greens and Italian Communists were gone two seats apiece. This means that, on equal terms, even today the two lists represent us in Europe. It is little difference, I think. And do not forget it, because if you change the starting conditions, the results are affected. That is just one on which count our "colluding / collis.

was hoping to better, of course. But - apart from the voters of other parties, of which I am now: at most I care! - There are some 'considerations that I mix for the head of the so-called leftists.

From pre-election I have deployed, with no possibility of misunderstanding.

I heard classmates say that they would abstained because they did not feel represented by any deployment and I are darkened: it is not blind faith that preaches absolute obedience to the party, will be missed. But, as Gaber said, "Freedom is participation." E non starsene fuori a fare i duri e puri (che se proprio, c’erano anche i “fratelli” del PCML…). Be’, spero che adesso siano soddisfatti. Adesso, grazie anche a loro, nel parlamento europeo a difendere gli interessi dei lavoratori italiani c’è… il PD. Auguri. Peccato che la cosa riguardi pure noi… Io avrei preferito mandare qualcuno in Europa e magari pressarlo da vicino in corso d’opera. Ma già: la democrazia vince… anche se le regole finisce che le dettano i pochi per i molti. Poi ci sono stati quelli che si son fatti abbindolare dal discorso del voto utile al PD : per me è una stupidaggine colossale perché il PD non è neppure di sinistra – come bear witness to the various Rutelli, Binetti & c. - Then this standard, we might as well vote for IDV. Maybe a De Magistris in Europe manages to be stronger than he had allowed to do here ... but we always apply the considerations outlined above.

During the campaign, I criticized SEL (among others ...) and I have left anything, because I consider them to be constructive criticism. I never wrote that I hoped that did not reach the quorum, however, because on certain issues you might have to agree, but I can not draw when I do not share certain positions. And that's it.

Now we are not in Europe, or PRC- PdCI-Socialisti2000 (the heirs of the PCI, so if we want to define), or SEL (heir to the PSI). And now the network will begin to find comments that complain about lack of unity of the left . But for heaven's sake: we remember what happened to 'Ar co ba the n or , which was the attempt (awkward, badly dressed and perhaps even ill-bred and poorly raised) wider cohesion to the left? It 'been a total fiasco. All together we have now less than it took every single list. I know you were political and not European, but the project still valid or is, or is incomplete. Why Europe should work in a menage a trois in which Italy has not held up to comparison with the voters? Because there was fear of the right? It seems to me that we have had enough of us ... well, not since yesterday.

resurface even wider speech units (at the time of Prodi will win ... so sure: with a majority so narrow that each puff of wind could topple the castle, and then it - as well as everything the left has failed to carry out in the name of common sense and maintain the coalition - was enough to throw a bucket every forty-eight cards, and the entire majority. Pace of the Left, which has also been felt criticized the "low profile", weakness, do not prevail).

memory is clearly not genetic heritage of the Italians. Now it's a nostalgic regret a period in which - however - was not met. And we also forget that the unity of the center were sent pell-mell from the PD, Veltroni with that thundered that he was running alone? So, units with whom? For what? On what basis? With what objectives?

I do not disturb the fact that there are two teams - let's say two parties - left (no more, if possible ...). Provided that the PSI can actually define the left, that is to Pertini and Craxi. It apparently does not disturb even their constituents, because "they returned to the fold" if it is true, it was, 3:38 + 3:12> 2 x 3084

And I do not even bother to work with them , if and when we have some common goal.

Bothers me however, and much, note that the left Berlusconi's winning attitude is taking hold: if something goes wrong is always someone else's fault. Responsibilities of those who did not vote, who he has not committed, who has turned his face, ever. And 'the fault of the party secretaries who decide everything by themselves. But someone will elect those secretaries, or were born with the chair attached to the lower back (poor mothers ...)? But someone will do that line, if we carry it forward? But they wake up in the morning and decide according to the time, do not deal with anyone, speak for themselves and / or each other? But please let's stop!

are men, like us, you can (or rather: we must) speak. Usually respond well. They are not, they do not, anointed by the Lord. They have proved the revelation ... we must stop claiming to be a messiah crucify when no paradise come true. Let's take all of our responsibilities, because then, if indeed we intend to hold your head up high (and I want to continue to do), it will be only from the example, from what we first give, we can do it.

So we continue on the road leading to the unification of Communist - if SEL will do likewise, we also find ourselves fighting together for the same things, and maybe then, our frightened voters will pass also fears for the symbols. It is not criticizing each other that we can hope to make inroads, true (and this does not mean having to be always agree), but even built a fake "good blood volume" in which all jump at the first opportunity.

Data sources:

the Republic for the 2004 European

Wikipedia policy of 2008

Ministry of Interior for the 2009 European