"Hostile to PdCI" Diliberto and "process" Marco Rizzo
Prosecutors came via telegram: "enmity to the party held in the last election campaign." Therefore, yesterday morning, Marco Rizzo stood before the National Commission on the Guarantee of the Italian Communists to account. But with absolute dissent says now "suspect", "Oliviero Diliberto does not pay the bill by two embarrassing defeats in the space of little more than a year, look for scapegoats instead of Interior and is ready to explain the procedure of my expulsion from the party. " One reason to charge the PDCI Rizzo has found. It has nothing to do with "the large part of my life dedicated with complete openness to militancy." La situazione – spiega – “è precipitata dopo che ho fatto notare a Diliberto che diverse iniziative pubbliche da lui svolte nel tempo lo vedevano sempre “accompagnato” da un volto noto della P2 di Licio Gelli: Giancarlo Elia Valori. Dal 2003 al 2007 il segretario ha partecipato a ben 8 avvenimenti con quest’uomo. Gli ho chiesto chiarimenti in forma riservata per non nuocere all’immagine del partito né alla campagna elettorale. Non ho ricevuto risposte plausibili, solo una procedura di espulsione”. Stamattina Rizzo argomenterà la sua difesa in una conferenza stampa alla Camera, intanto però precisa:”Io non so se Di liberto sia iscritto ad associazioni segrete né m’interessa saperlo. But I have documents to prove his acquaintances embarrassing, so I ask the immediate resignation: it can speak a common secretariat for so long with an expression of those powers which says in words always want to fight? ".
Source: Corriere della Sera, Tuesday, June 23, page 19
Ensures Rizzo: "For some time my critical stance on the participation of communists in Prodi's government, and the bad choice of the Rainbow the recent and ill-managed unit of the Communists was so unwelcome by management as popular with grassroots activists. As it happens, the situation has plunged right now, immediately after having noted the Secretary-Diliberto says Rizzo (which was convened by the guarantee of the Party) - a puzzle of local government initiatives he carried out in time will always see 'accompanied' by a well-known face of the P2.
Rizzo refers to the super manager Giancarlo Elia Valori, "I understand the blade-sharpening Rizzo citing 'well' eight occasions they have seen Diliberto together with 'a man linked to P2'-chief of that can happen to everyone to participate in meetings with public partners 'embarrassing', it remains difficult to justify when the meetings are the fruit of knowledge to the point of even being the presenter of books. "
June 23, 2009
MY COMMENT:
The juice of two articles, even if one refers to the "before" the other "during" is that I do not like. For many reasons, that if I have to be summed up in two words define "communist ethics."
not we, dear Rizzo, we did not own. not within the substance of your charges - we think, if he considers it appropriate, my party secretary, who does not need a lawyer of my (low) caliber. Not that I intend to defend the Secretary as such, you understand well: I spent some time as long as what the secretary said Gospel was the assumption that the definition of 'Communist fideist "I've ever worn: already at eighteen I had qualms about giving control to the Secretary of the Chamber as often as not I found it convincing ... but these are my own. What about all the comrades of the PDCI to the extent that I do not think we need a secretary-messiah who constantly give us the cue on what to do, how to act, what to say and think ... and you take all the blame Sometimes something does not turn in the direction desired. Because otherwise we can find a religion that pile and put the brains to do the lobotomized.
Do not I will say that I do not like you as an individual because this is strictly personal impression and "skin", which dates back to the congress in Rimini, when you walk around the bar nicely ignoring everything that was not part of the world's proven Your turn: I find that the behavior of a partner, but if you are "so" I can not think that you are worthless as a matter subjective. No, the fact is that I do not like, I never liked it, your protagonist, your desire to be first woman and put on display. For example, when you properly - I do not know how - the mailing list of common United advertise something of yours (and nemmanco you were writing that for you have received a lot 'of protest ... at least you apologized? I do not think), or when you have stubbornly continued to personally sign appeals have already been signed by the party ... or when you breathless to request on Facebook, for the umpteenth time, the head of the secretary guilty of not having won the elections (ground, not being able to obtain 4%) instead of, say, maybe you explain what have you done during your stay in the European Parliament. Ok, 77% attendance at meetings, but for what? The excuse of being in the minority does not hold, because otherwise it should also apply to those who, in Italy, has spent more than in questa campagna.
Ma poi scusa, se davvero le frequentazioni del nostro non-più-tuo segretario tanto ti preoccupano, come mai ci hai messo così tanto a chiedergliene conto? Perché stando alle tue parole “ … Dal 2003 al 2007 il segretario ha partecipato a ben 8 avvenimenti con quest’uomo.” : e tu aspetti adesso? Come mai proprio adesso? Aggià: “Gli ho chiesto chiarimenti in forma riservata per non nuocere all’immagine del partito né alla campagna elettorale. Non ho ricevuto risposte plausibili, solo una procedura di espulsione” . Il che significa che il tutto è avvenuto di recente, perché tra l’altro non mi dai proprio la sensazione di essere uno particolarmente paziente.
No, mi dispiace, non mi incanti. Uno che si professa comunista “con la larga parte della mia vita dedicata con totale trasparenza alla militanza” ha il DOVERE di cercare il chiarimento di faccende così gravi con la massima speed. Your timing instead suggests only one thing: points in his place and, having failed to undermine in any other way, the implication here is ready venomous and poisonous. Because I assure you: If your business would be limited to expulsion, do not shed a tear nemmanco. But I know for a fact that other fellow (I hope a few, very few indeed) will follow you, they will in good faith. And I'm sorry to lose them.
As for you, I think it would be much more dignified - and even ethical, to be '- do not wait you eject it, but you go. I am in a party with piduista a secretary, consciously, I would never there. Not even the chair. Nor for the chair. But yeah, I'm just a dark sezioncina licensed in the province, who want to understand the corridors of power ...
What then: not too much I liked the rainbow, but I did what I could to the campaign ... little, too little, I tell myself. And when it's over and the 'merry band "broke up, though I certainly breathed a sigh of relief I did not cry. But I was taught that democratic centralism expected to take forward the decisions of the party, not that he is rowing against work in progress ... and if you were so little agreement, both in this session than in the past, why did you stay? You'd always been able to seek asylum in the PCML ... see ...? The PdAC? NO. In my opinion you point to another party, the only one who could well layers: yours.
