Premessa: questo pezzo è in fase di studio da parecchio… quindi i riferimenti temporali non sono da prendere alla lettera (ieri potrebbe anche essere tre mesi fa!).
Non stupisca che, anziché rivolgermi a quelli che sono i miei “referenti naturali”, indirizzo questa missiva ad un ipotetico sindacalista generico.
Infatti is designed to the concept of union - in the sense of guardian, guarantor, and the increase of all the rights of all workers - not for a specific character: in the course of my working life, in fact, I could check on Then my skin as a symbol does not always correspond to an appropriate behavior.
I knew that I would gladly trade union CGIL - metaphorically speaking - threw a couple of slaps (the ones in the hours of strike ambushes read the newspaper in the classroom union, those who would accept a direct control over the amount of calls handled by a single operator for not showing off and risk retaliation, are just two glaring examples) and UIL trade union militant and more prepared than me ... even if the dispute was me! And yet even found the fighting spirit of Epifani does not make me forget that he was agreed on severance pay in the funds ...
But I will not talk to me, are a particular case (" human, "says someone ...) and instead here I am interested in a more general discussion.
Dear union, said: THIRTY possible that workers who have lost the workplace (not your fault, mind you, but for the usual hackneyed cabal of liberalism and the market), backed by a "work accident" which occurred in seven serious their colleagues are no longer able to find a shred of Employment ESTABLISHED part because the civil trial against the property? possible that I, like most Italians fear, must come to know through a couple of interventions in TV (and Ballarò AnnoZero, incidentally ...) Oliviero Diliberto - miraculously reappeared after ' caused by a darkening of the last general election, that is, after more than a year! - While you do not have convened meetings, strikes ... nothing? Perhaps it only affects a sector of workers in Piedmont, and not all workers in general because it is a clear infringement of their right?
In times of "friendly government" not shake too much, I think you understand, not to embarrass a program that you did not find the enemy clearly. In fact, the contingent was knocked down by Craxi and Amato ... But in times of right-wing government, what? This silent reports of a serious scary because you do not have the power to impose appropriate responses?
E lo so anch’io che c’è la crisi, lo so direttamente sulla mia pelle. Non ho bisogno di un Angeletti che mi venga a parlare delle difficoltà dei pensionati… solo, mi piacerebbe che qualcuno gli ricordasse, tra l’altro, che “i pensionati” non sono una categoria: anche i dirigenti vanno in pensione… ma che abbiano difficoltà a tirare la fine del mese è duro sostenerlo in modo credibile!
Ma so anche che non è continuando a calare la guardia che i problemi dei lavoratori (ecco note: workers. With all the logical consequences ...) can be solved. Last example, FIAT. National problem, of course. Whenever there is an air of crisis is a national problem, and when there is an air of profits is a fact that affects only the shareholders, already does this to me the creeps. But, of course, I'm not saying that the workers of the Fiat and the world revolves around us must be abandoned to themselves, God forbid! Only, I'd love to hear your voice, my union, claiming that the government convene by phone or in short, in some way to get in touch with Mr. Marchionne and ask specific guarantees for workers Italian. Just as others are doing. Why the government, this government has no intention to disturb the ongoing maneuver in understandable - they are not the supporters of free trade? And then, as "rightly" pointed out last night Bombassei, if the production finds a surplus of personnel, you cut ... perhaps looking for places to do just as well, yeah ... but who determines who is less evil? I believe that anyone, Italian, Polish, Chinese or South American, when placed in layoffs or, worse (because the layoffs, as recalled yesterday Diliberto, is an Italian law, strongly backed by the PCI and other countries is not !), even fired, feel useless and you may also go into depression, especially at a time like the present, when the workers Bombassei says he is willing to hire them ... and then lay off as his own. But the speech Bombassei is typical of the entrepreneur and it is unclear what the union. In my opinion, the union must try to protect jobs, but also has other problems arise. For example: Marchionne says Fiat to float (with perhaps the Chrysler and Opel) must produce a certain number of cars. Well, but nobody comes to mind to ask if those who buy, its cars? It is not so automatic that production becomes sale and if the workers (as well as employees, as to that ...) are cassintegrati or fired, as if buying the car, ok state incentives, But not enough ... and the rest of us know how we fund, we ask for a loan from the bank after we have trumpeted ad nauseam that we are better than others because we have less debt?
Or think of going to sell in Africa, that the market is saturated? But with that money paying them to him, 'these machines? Apart from that, as far as I know, the only conceivable types of cars there are tanks and jeeps, all right ... if they are not exactly cheap.
And then, if by chance this adventure goes wrong, all workers involved (those who remain, of course!) Lying on the ground. And Mr. Marchionne? What does his contract as severance pay? No, because I'm notoriously "shifty-eyed", but has anyone checked?
No. The union as I see I must think of the people before the production. GDP This is a rip off. An individual must work to live - in dignity, say the Constitution - and not live to work. Never heard of otium of Latinos, as opposed to the (base) negotium? It 'obvious that the entrepreneurs, the "owners" do not take into account and the fact I abhor. Because then people would have free time use it as you think, maybe even by turning the wheels and reflecting on all the antics that are served up as irrefutable truth, and instead are refutabilissime ... and rigettabilissime. But if one spends three quarters of the day between work and time to go there, that's time to think it is a little ... which means people are much more malleable.
I said above that we want firm guarantees for Italian workers, but to be clear: I do not mean say that if the redundancies will be foreign workers all is well. We need to think "big". They want the free market, they want globalization? So globalization even rights. First, the right to dignified life. For everyone.
And now I hear the protests: no money ... but they went looking for them among the tax evaders, a good time! The rumor among entrepreneurs (but no one will confirm it openly) that the orders are there, just waiting for September ... and meanwhile take advantage of the layoffs - those who can, of course, the other cut and go. and donating the money withheld from obsolete and fanciful on the payroll, such as that for the orphans of war in Ethiopia, or for public housing (at least the built) and many other imposts that instead of disappearing into the pockets of someone who does not if you just sweat.
But beyond FIAT and the world revolves around, there is more. There are workers from other companies that produce and that therefore should be protected in the same way.
Meanwhile also came the reassurances of Mr. Marchionne ... So, do not Menara or woe is that I want to be pessimistic at all costs. It 's just that the first time I was assured, were already in advanced study of the "outsourcing", the second time incentives to resign, while the third ... well,' the third closed the branch in Italy resulting in dismissal workers. Of course, we were in a few multinational companies and it was ... but, as my mother-in-law said: "When the devil caresses you want the soul." Sorry if I can not be optimistic!
Meanwhile I hear that "The process Parliamentary approval of the settlement, per room
(NO), the death factory for the assembly of F-35 is now defined. From 2010 onwards, will begin construction of the shed from which will come out of the machines that will be delivered in different states who will use them to bomb and kill. The military-industrial enterprise is conducted with a large expenditure of public money, the U.S. multinational Lockheed Martin in association with the Italian Alenia Aeronautica (Finmeccanica group) and will involve a large number of arms factories of death and placed here and there on our territory. In short, the reset as a way out by the economic crisis, as with the Great Depression of the '30s and the Great Depression of the late '800. Too bad that in both cases, this road has resulted in world wars. Of course, the use of new bombers in missions of peace "will produce destruction, death and suffering. Sure the F-35 are the perfect tools for operating a sort of gendarmerie in the process of perfecting the world: once built will do some rust in some hangar Italian or Dutch, but will soon be used to kill and destroy in various wars, both current and future. The F-35 will cost us a lot of money: € 600 million to build and activate la fabbrica di Cameri, circa 13 miliardi di euro (a rate, fino al 2026) per l'acquisto dei 131 aerei che l'Italia vuole possedere. Del resto è stato già speso o impegnato quasi un miliardo di euro. E ciò risulta ancor più impressionante se si considera la grave crisi economica in corso. Nessuno può ignorare che, con una spesa di questa entità, si potrebbero senza alcun dubbio creare ben più dei miseri 600 posti di lavoro promessi all'interno dello stabilimento di Cameri. Si potrebbe altresì intervenire in vario modo per migliorare le condizioni di vita di tutti: per esempio ampliando e migliorando la qualità della spesa sociale, tutelando davvero territori e città (basti pensare agli effetti del terremoto abruzzese), investendo in fonti energetiche rinnovabili e ridistribuendo reddito.
E poi vogliono costruire gli F-35 proprio ai confini del parco naturale del Ticino, che dovrebbe quindi sopportare l'impatto dei collaudi di centinaia e centinaia di aerei rumorosissimi e certamente inquinanti, con le relative gravi conseguenze per la salute e la qualità della vita degli abitanti della zona, mentre si potrebbe riconvertire il sito militare ad uso civile. In definitiva, siamo contro gli F-35 perché ci ostiniamo a pensare che sia possibile vivere in un altro modo: senza aggredire gli altri popoli, senza militarizzare il territorio ed i rapporti sociali, operando perché cessi davvero la terribile guerra permanente che l'occidente dei ricchi conduce contro i poveri del nord e del sud del mondo…”
(questa è la fonte : http://www.nof35.org/ )
Possiamo in coscienza dirci soddisfatti? No, io credo. Perché la difesa dei posti di lavoro (o l’aumento della quantità degli stessi) secondo me non può prescindere da considerazioni etiche. Sarebbe come dire che va benissimo produrre le mine antiuomo perché altrimenti qualcuno resta a casa. Of course, the goal is not to make trouble for some (many or few they may be) employed. But you can not get an overview of the world and especially not to think the same fate - and our children.
Now I do not think I'm the "guaranteed", the labor law that down from his secure job to shoot zero on others. Quite the contrary. After the final dismissal took me eight months to find another job, and yet there was no talk of a crisis so violent was in 2004. I was told I was too expensive, too experienced, too old ... but too young to retire. The place I am now (big word, since they are four months that I do not see: hip surgeries, are sick with various problems of recovery) is a handicraft company that deals with plastics, another field that I think is to reduce drastically. Which shows that I also speak against my specific interest, but then I believe that or we start looking at the world with a view to "globalization," or we lock up in our microcosms selfish. And this is enough for me ... the League
do not underestimate the problem of conversion di una linea di automobili ad una di trattori o, chessò, di pannelli solari: ma se continuassimo a produrre auto mentre organizziamo diversamente le lavorazioni? Senza porci il problema delle 10.000 o più, che tanto chisselecompra…
We employed, at least. The bureaucrats in the trade unions maybe yes, but they represent only themselves, not us. They speak to areas of interest (the other, which leads to more recognition, forgetting that a worker is that whatever his role or his age): care of the young (and is fine) they snatched a future, but how many them pay attention to those who have more than 40 years, which are cassintegrati or, worse, redundant and have no prospect of finding alternative employment, at least accompany the retirement age? They have never done a census of insecurity over the age of 40? How they plan to do for these workers? And now they can no longer, as their 'illustrious' predecessor did, believing that it is "human cases", we are just too many. Just read this post and the comments: http://solleviamoci.wordpress.com/2009/02/25/levante-disoccupato-e-disperato-% C2% ABvendo kidney-one-% c2% bb / # comment-11074 , or that other : http://solleviamoci.wordpress.com/2008/03/05/% C2% ABnon-find-work% C2% BB-unemployed-it-hangs / # comment-11157
that the crisis affects all ages, moreover, the article also says this:
http://giuseppe-mb.wordpress.com/2009/03/04/umiliati-e-arrabbiati/
Now If you feel outraged and / or injured in the depths, can mean two things: either you are a of those trade-union bureaucrats (and then you are right to feel a party: it is with you that I have it), or do you think - wrongly - that my speech is indifferent. Is not: not to deny that there are union members (normally the base) who are fighting for the rights of all, God forbid. I know of ... and surly as I normally have. Why then turn to the union workers only when they need it, do not sign up regardless. True, but you think it is logical to expect them to believe in someone who has helped arrange a force to kneel? That have made of them, do that too. But now you can do to recover not only give an example, a good example. It is not that there are many around ... we take the wage-speech: we can from this article: http://laclasseoperaia.blogspot.com/2009/05/elogio-della-scala-mobile.html and compare with this one: http://it.peacereporter.net/articolo/15522/Gli+armamenti% 2C + l% 27Eldorado + also + for + the + crisis
The first argues that we must reintroduce the escalator (I repeat: removed a couple of friendly governments ... what if you were enemies!), while the latter states that " Finmeccanica is in contrast recession than the Italian: earn, grow and share out dividends ... shareholders and employment? From a reading of this item in the quarterly report we note that companies have an increasing sign of a tight if not a decrease in employment, this is a testament to the fact that investments carry a slight increase of military personnel, which would be far greater than equal Investment in the direction of civil aviation. "
Far be it from me to suggest cages wage that - although it is undeniable that coffee does not have the same price all over the country ... Who knows why - the masters use to their advantage (and the union, excuse me for saying so, lacks the strength to oppose), it is also true that a steak to Milan costs the same for a worker for a trade of 'industry or craft. Also forced a precarious or a holder of VAT! But the union speaks of "bargaining power" that determines the increases in salaries. Be ', regardless of whether that power seems to me we have little - not now - I would say that the task of the union, what I want, is to ensure compliance with those provisions of the Constitution (but we say just the first paragraph Article 36: "The worker is entitled to remuneration commensurate with the quantity and quality of their work and in all cases sufficient to assure them and their families a free and dignified.")
Last but not least, the issue of safety at work. The latest figures say that we are - finally! - In contrast, that the deaths at work decreased. Already a shame that we are talking about more than three deaths a day, and meanwhile grow accident ... "on" even foreign workers, yet the least protected. Those who are even more cannon fodder ...
'm sorry, I know that I have not said anything new. I know I'm a dreamer, and seem to live in utopia ... but given that even a friendly government is able (or willing) to make laws for employees (if not part of his personal ratings of tanks, of course) How about if we do we?
And while we're at, remember that there is a petition online People against the crisis:
